Oleksii Krutykh vs Maxence Rivet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In an analysis of serving performance over the past six months, Rivet has achieved a 39.43% success rate on second serve points. In contrast, Krutykh has demonstrated greater efficiency with a 44.13% success rate. This discrepancy in second serve effectiveness often plays a significant role in forecasting match outcomes.

Examining their ability to handle return games, Rivet has won 43.74% of points on their opponent's second serve, whereas Krutykh has surpassed this with a 47.46% success rate. When it comes to first serve returns, the statistics hover closely at 30.12% for Rivet and 30.13% for Krutykh, reflecting the tight competition in predicting a favorite in this matchup.

Evaluating performance under pressure, Rivet has managed to save 53.19% of breakpoints recently. Meanwhile, Krutykh has saved 48.23% of breakpoints, a factor that could be decisive in live betting scenarios. Over the past year, Rivet has secured victories in 53.57% of matches played with a record of 30 wins and 26 losses. On the other hand, Krutykh has a slightly higher win percentage of 55.42%, recording 46 wins against 37 losses, providing a comprehensive head-to-head performance overview.

Both players show their strength on clay, each registering a career win percentage of 60% on this surface. However, Rivet's performance dips on indoor hard courts with a 30% win rate, whereas Krutykh struggles most on grass, evident in a 33% win rate. The quality and level of competition also differ; Rivet has primarily played in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K tier, winning 54.55% of matches. Krutykh, participating mostly in the same tier, boasts a higher win rate of 60%.

When evaluating the caliber of opponents faced over the last 12 months, Rivet's opponents had an average rank of 410.63, marginally higher than Krutykh's opponents with an average rank of 418.48. This metric subtly influences predictions. In situations where matches extend to a deciding set, Krutykh has a slight edge, having won 47% of such sets compared to Rivet's 44% success rate.

As for breaking point opportunities, Rivet has been slightly more successful, converting 29.2% of chances, slightly ahead of Krutykh's 28.57%. This statistic is especially valuable for live betting, offering insights into likely break point outcomes during matches.

Considering the recent forms and statistics, Krutykh emerges with a marginally better performance outlook, especially in serving and deciding set conditions. However, the narrow differences in some areas suggest that the contest could be competitive. Based on the comparative data, Krutykh appears to have a slight edge going into this match.